Is this an isolated case or a precedent? Recently, Battlefield 6 quietly removed the Rush mode after an update, causing extreme dissatisfaction among many veteran players. One Steam veteran, who had played for 470 hours, angrily initiated a Steam refund. On August 8, the player announced that the refund was surprisingly successful.
·Could it be that the person who approved this player's refund was also extremely dissatisfied with the removal of this mode? On August 4, Battlefield 6 received an update that quietly removed the Rush mode. This was soon discovered and condemned by angry players. One player posted, "Steam just fully refunded me for Battlefield 6 after 470 hours played due to so many game modes being removed at once," strongly demanding a refund! Refund!
·Moreover, this player is a loyal fan of the series. They originally purchased the prestigious Phantom Edition for $109.24, yet unexpectedly received a full refund without any hassle.
·It's hard to imagine the consequences if this sets a precedent. Stay tuned for further developments.
